[stc] JEA10

[thegreatfalcon]

The layout was basically gruesome to work with... I think we'll improve this on next JEA... (11th)

Top-left - Pacman_Ownage
Top-Middle - Buka
Top-right - 1nsane
Middle-left - egamad
Middle-middle- Quklis
Middle-right - P0NA
Bottom-left - haq
Bottom-middle - Gustvo Marques
Bottom-right - Pacman_Ownage

[Buka]

WTF? JEA 10 - what an incredible name! Couldn't you at least read JEA thread to find out who made those 2 squares?

I'm very disappointed with this track.

[PacmanOwnage]

I think it's fair to say everyone who participated is disappointed with it, although i think the actual whole track is actually rather good, it's just trying to find a suitable layout, and then editing it to that

And top left was also mine

(EDIT:)

Now i'm not entirely sure if this is ok with everyone, but this JEA seemed to get half ashed through production, so seeing the end product, i felt i wanted to re-do my original square, and whilst at it, do some more finishing touches

So i re-worked my square, and PONAs Re-did the tracks AI and everything else, added a new 'oval' layout and gave it a name so without further ado, my rendition of Union Junction...

...But alas i can not upload a screenie as i have a nooby Generally/laptop conversion that won't take the normal shots

[egamad]

Even if no one wanted to take the FTs, you should have put in more effort.. At least crediting all the authors for their work is the least you should do.

Then you didn't even bother to ask for a name, and some (mine) lmap bridges are out of perspective and should be reworked. I feel you rushed this one (what irony) too much.

But as far as the track itself goes, it's a great track considering it's a JEA. Awesome work by everybody, congrats guys!

[Trigger Happy]

Even not bother by thinking about name for the track.

[thegreatfalcon]

1. Even if no one wanted to take the FTs, you should have put in more effort.. At least crediting all the authors for their work is the least you should do.

2. Then you didn't even bother to ask for a name, and some (mine) lmap bridges are out of perspective and should be reworked. I feel you rushed this one (what irony) too much.

3. But as far as the track itself goes, it's a great track considering it's a JEA. Awesome work by everybody, congrats guys!

1. Well, I didn't intended either to have my go at FTs... It was just to have it "working"...
2. Why would an unfinished track need a name?
3. Yup, We're JEA, not JE...

[Lukeno94]

Why release an unfinished track? Very bad decision IMO.

[dead14vii1640]

If the diagonal street in the middle works, I can transform it into a real track in just 15 mins... and I'm not a good trackmaker at all!!!

[thegreatfalcon]

Could we just "forget" this one and concentrate on the next track please?

[Lukeno94]

No, because it raises lots of flaws in the way you're running the JEA.

[Trigger Happy]

I think same, since moving from P0NA to TGF I think, that the project doesn't work like should. I would like to see much more passion and care on TGF's side for it.

[1nsane]

Oh wait, haha I did the top right. I didn't even remember it myself before seeing that picture. No wonder it looked familiar.

And uhh, maybe there are some things that would need to be fixed but still it is a pretty good job overall. So no, I don't know what the fuzz is all about. Ok, it could have had a name... Something like Driver's nightmare...

[PacmanOwnage]

Well, at least that's sorted out one problem

[Darjo]

No, because it raises lots of flaws in the way you're running the JEA.

I actually totally agree with TGF, I noticed that no one was having fun when finishing this track and it's a good idea to move on with a new project. Anyways, even with good FT the track wouldn't change THAT much.

[Bouncebackability]

yeah, move on! time to start afresh