Is it really that bad to have images in a signature?
They provide a greater sense of individuality between users.
I know that currently no images are allowed in a signature, but I don't think it would be invasive to have them if you were to, say, change the rules to something like this:
1 or 2 images of 60x400px allowed, 1 120x400px image allowed.
If one 60x400px, two lines of text, If two 60x400px or one 120x400px, one line of text.
BBcode easily allows this, and I feel it would be non-invasive.
Just wondering,
AE86
Images in Signature?
Images in Signature?
The AE86 is undoubtedly the best drift car ever. If for nothing else, for its longevity.
- Trigger Happy
- Posts: 7134
- Joined: Sat Dec 26, 2009 9:54 pm
- Location: CZE
- Contact: